home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1993
/
TIME Almanac 1993.iso
/
time
/
052989
/
05298900.052
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1992-08-28
|
2KB
|
45 lines
LETTERS, Page 17FUSION OR ILLUSION?
Whether Utah's Stanley Pons and Britain's Martin
Fleischmann achieved cold fusion in a jar or merely a storm in
a teacup (SCIENCE, May 8), they abdicated their higher calling
as scientists in favor of "media science," a pseudoscientific
forum. Unfortunately, their proponents and opponents have
decided to choose the same regrettable course.
Julian W. Proctor Wexford, Pa.
One can understand why an announcement by two unknown
scientists that they had achieved fusion would generate
excitement. But why the expressions of outrage? Here are some
reactions from modern scientists:
How can chemists presume to know anything about atoms?
How could anyone from Utah possibly discover anything?
How dare these people compete for my funding?
I was recently at an international scientific conference on
fusion, and these views (phrased somewhat differently) were
prominent.
Theodore Rockwell Chevy Chase, Md.
We know we can't get something from nothing, but human
longing resurfaces. The search for unlimited power through
fusion is a revival of the perennial dream of mastering the
superhuman.
Eugen Roder Leutkirch, West Germany
How can such a simple experiment produce something not
previously discovered? I am skeptical of the claims.
Toby Griffin Erlanger, Ky.
In response to your report, I'd say that there's inclusion
of delusion with a profusion of confusion!
Joseph M. Kosanovic Pittsburgh